This paper argues that non-white applicants for immigration to Canada are a historically disadvantaged group entitled to protection under Section 15 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is argued that this group has been discriminated against on the basis of colour, race, ethnic and national origin, in that they were historically denied the advantages of admission to Canada. The current immigrant profile reveals that these historically disadvantaged groups now make up the majority of new immigrants to Canada. This paper argues, however, that when these new immigrants have sought to use equality legislation to challenge immigration selection decisions, that the legislation and the Courts have perpetuated the historic discrimina...
This paper considers the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2007 section 15 jurisprudence, and analyzes the “...
The paper examines the ways the tests for discrimination expounded in the statutory and constitution...
This article provides a justification for applying distinct legal tests to adjudicate discrimination...
Major Research Paper (Master's), Critical Disability Studies, School of Health Policy and Management...
Since the 19th century, American courts have relied on the “plenary power doctrine” to hold that fed...
Although both the Canadian Charter and the United States Constitutions protect persons from denial o...
This article examines the impact that the suggested changes would have on the immigration power as p...
Almost a decade ago, in June 2000, the Canadian Human Rights Act Review Panel conducted a comprehens...
L'impact potentiel du droit à l'égalité de la Charte canadienne sur le système d'immigration canadie...
This article attempts to trace how the infuriatingly elusive concept of equality has been applied in...
This article contends that parental undocumented status can and should be recognized as an analogous...
Canada and India are both pluralistic democracies with diverse populations. Both countries have draf...
While trumpeting the values of diversity, Canada's current immigration practices exclude immigrants ...
This article analyzes the use of international human rights in the decision making of Canada\u27s Im...
The Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (OHRC) Policy on removing the ‘Canadian experience’ barrier (C...
This paper considers the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2007 section 15 jurisprudence, and analyzes the “...
The paper examines the ways the tests for discrimination expounded in the statutory and constitution...
This article provides a justification for applying distinct legal tests to adjudicate discrimination...
Major Research Paper (Master's), Critical Disability Studies, School of Health Policy and Management...
Since the 19th century, American courts have relied on the “plenary power doctrine” to hold that fed...
Although both the Canadian Charter and the United States Constitutions protect persons from denial o...
This article examines the impact that the suggested changes would have on the immigration power as p...
Almost a decade ago, in June 2000, the Canadian Human Rights Act Review Panel conducted a comprehens...
L'impact potentiel du droit à l'égalité de la Charte canadienne sur le système d'immigration canadie...
This article attempts to trace how the infuriatingly elusive concept of equality has been applied in...
This article contends that parental undocumented status can and should be recognized as an analogous...
Canada and India are both pluralistic democracies with diverse populations. Both countries have draf...
While trumpeting the values of diversity, Canada's current immigration practices exclude immigrants ...
This article analyzes the use of international human rights in the decision making of Canada\u27s Im...
The Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (OHRC) Policy on removing the ‘Canadian experience’ barrier (C...
This paper considers the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2007 section 15 jurisprudence, and analyzes the “...
The paper examines the ways the tests for discrimination expounded in the statutory and constitution...
This article provides a justification for applying distinct legal tests to adjudicate discrimination...